# Command R+ vs Llama 13b

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 257 | 348 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 683 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 728 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 100.58 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 838 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 47.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Command R+: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 781 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 753 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Llama 13b?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Llama 13b better for coding?

Command R+ scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.1 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Llama 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.