# Command R+ vs Laguna M.1

> Command R+ and Laguna M.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-laguna-m-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Laguna M.1 leads 23.1 to 9.2.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 32.5 |
| Rank | 257 | 256 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1349 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Laguna M.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Laguna M.1?

Command R+ and Laguna M.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Command R+ or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Laguna M.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.