# Command R+ vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 9.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 17.4% for Command R+ and 57.9% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 257 | 94 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R+: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 149.97 |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command R+ or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.