# Command R+ vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

> Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-hunyuan-vision-1-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 9.2.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 257 | 98 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1418 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1416 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R+: —
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1397 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1404 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1422 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.