# Command R+ vs Granite 4.1 8b

> Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-granite-4-1-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Granite 4.1 8b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 25.7 to 9.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 257 | 205 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1312 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1192 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1293 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1312 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1309 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1261 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1269 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1275 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1290 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1251 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1268 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

Granite 4.1 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Granite 4.1 8b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.