# Command R+ vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

> Command R+ and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-granite-3-1-8b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 22.1 to 9.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 257 | 258 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1186 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R+: —
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1145 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1152 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1142 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1099 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1145 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1092 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1131 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1162 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1150 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1129 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1108 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

Command R+ and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Command R+ or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.