# Command R+ vs GLM-4.5V

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5V leads 27.4 to 9.2.
- GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Command R+ accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 64K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 257 | 158 |
| Context | 128K | 64K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $1.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1334 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1354 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1353 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R+: —
- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1311 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1304 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1332 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R+ or GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command R+ or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Command R+ does, with 128K tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and GLM-4.5V share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.