# Command R+ vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 19.9 to 9.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 257 | 206 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1268 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1284 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1246 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1255 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1276 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1276 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.