# Command R+ vs Gemma 2B

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-gemma-2b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 2B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.7 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 251 | 305 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 28.6 (#304)
- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | 34.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 8.9 (#341)
- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 989 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | 93.57 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |

## Math

- Command R+: 26.6 (#239)
- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1009 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 35.9 (#165)
- Gemma 2B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 42.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.8 (#222)
- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1208 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.2 (#249)
- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 971 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#214)
- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 981 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.7 (#223)
- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 945 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Gemma 2B?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Gemma 2B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.6 vs 28.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Gemma 2B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.