# Command R+ vs Gemma 2 27B

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 6.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-gemma-2-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 30

## Summary

- They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R+ leads 28.9 to 10.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 19.1% for Command R+ and 36% for Gemma 2 27B.
- Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Command R+ accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 8K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 257 | 312 |
| Context | 128K | 8K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.65 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.65 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | 42.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | 36% |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1211 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | 52.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | 28.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1198 |
| DTBench | 54.9% | 48% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | 47.9% |
| LMCA | 5% | 7.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 122.08 |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | 38.2% |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | 26.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1212 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 27.9% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1172 |
| MMLU | 69.4% | 75.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 36.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 27.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1221 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1247 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | 58.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1206 |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1231 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1224 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | 32.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Gemma 2 27B?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 6.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Gemma 2 27B?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command R+ or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Command R+ does, with 128K tokens against 8K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Gemma 2 27B share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.