# Command R+ vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-gemma-1-1-7b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 30.4.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 31.3 |
| Rank | 257 | 277 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1084 |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | 35.4% |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1071 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1107 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1039 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1052 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1065 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1054 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 971 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 988 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1049 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1057 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1056 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1094 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1060 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1040 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.