# Command R+ vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.6 to 60.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Math: 21.3% for Command R+ and 71% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 251 | 171 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R+: 28.6 (#304)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | 63.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 8.9 (#341)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | 60.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | 65.1% |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 26.6 (#239)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 35.9 (#165)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.8 (#222)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1208 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.2 (#249)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#214)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.7 (#223)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.