# Command R+ vs Falcon-180B

> Command R+ and Falcon-180B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-falcon-180b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 3 categories and Falcon-180B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 257 | 260 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 112.13 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 70.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1013 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than Falcon-180B?

Command R+ and Falcon-180B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Falcon-180B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.