# Command R+ vs DeepSeek Coder 6.7B

> Command R+ has enough public results to be ranked (#251); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-deepseek-coder-6-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek Coder 6.7B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads 35.2 to 28.6.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 251 | — |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 28.6 (#304)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | 35.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | 43.8% |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | 71.3% |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | 65.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 8.9 (#341)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | 88.88 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 57.6% |

## Math

- Command R+: 26.6 (#239)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 21.3% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 35.9 (#165)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 36.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 36.4% |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.8 (#222)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1208 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.2 (#249)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#214)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.7 (#223)
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than DeepSeek Coder 6.7B?

Command R+ has enough public results to be ranked (#251); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Command R+ or DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and DeepSeek Coder 6.7B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9.