# Command R+ vs DBRX

> Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-plus-vs-dbrx
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 6 categories and DBRX in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 14.9.

## Snapshot

| | Command R+ | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Databricks |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 257 | 311 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R+: 29.1 (#309)
- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1132 |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | 70.1% |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | 55.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R+: 9.2 (#344)
- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1113 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |

## Math

- Command R+: 28.9 (#242)
- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1145 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command R+: 36.4 (#169)
- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1076 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R+: 38.6 (#227)
- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1071 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1068 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1096 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1057 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 990 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 993 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1078 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1064 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R+: 60.0 (#254)
- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1112 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R+: 37.3 (#219)
- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1112 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R+: 43.5 (#228)
- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)

| Benchmark | Command R+ | DBRX |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1119 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1104 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1111 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R+ better than DBRX?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R+ or DBRX better for coding?

DBRX scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R+ and DBRX share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and DBRX has 21.