# Command A vs Yi-1.5-34B

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-yi-1-5-34b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 36.5 to 14.8.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 30.2 |
| Rank | 212 | 286 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1169 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Yi-1.5-34B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1160 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1120 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1139 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1144 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1153 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Yi-1.5-34B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.