# Command A vs Step 1o Turbo 202506

> Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-step-1o-turbo-202506
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 2 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 38.6 to 26.8.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 212 | 160 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 38.6 (#158)

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1339 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 25.7 (#127)

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1336 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 33.9 (#163)

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1318 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.5 (#174)

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1308 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.4 (#75)

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.5 (#168)

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1380 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1315 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1327 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1311 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.1 (#141)

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1350 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.4 (#154)

| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1308 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1341 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?

Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?

Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.