# Command A vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

> Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-vl-235b-a22b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 42.4 to 27.2.
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 43.2 |
| Rank | 215 | 95 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1439 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1428 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1426 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1442 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1452 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1408 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1428 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1420 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1428 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Command A does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.