# Command A vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Max leads 42.4 to 26.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 28.8% for Command A and 72.5% for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen3 Max is cheaper at $1.20 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Qwen3 Max accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 212 | 82 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1456 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 72.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 82.1% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 28.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.41 |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1457 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1450 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Max does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3 Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.