# Command A vs Qwen3.8 27B

> Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-8-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.8 27B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 50.5 to 27.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 41.4% for Qwen3.8 27B.
- Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper at $0.04 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Qwen3.8 27B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 46.0 |
| Rank | 215 | 68 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $2.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1482 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1593 |
| SciCode | — | 46.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 47.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 88% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 41.4% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 42.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 54.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.38 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1456 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1482 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1271 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1504 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1465 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1438 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1384 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1393 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1448 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1450 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1384 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1671 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1441 |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 27B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3.8 27B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.