# Command A vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 48.4 to 17.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 44% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper at $2.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 51.4 |
| Rank | 212 | 35 |
| Context | 256K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1483 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 92.3% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 44% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.74 |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1488 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1488 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1533 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1482 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1484 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1450 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1482 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper. It lists at $2.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3.7 Max share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.