# Command A vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 27B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 34.5% for Qwen3.6 27B.
- Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper at $0.60 / $3.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Qwen3.6 27B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 41.9 |
| Rank | 212 | 112 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 61.3% | 78.1% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 34.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.47 |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 27B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3.6 27B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.