# Command A vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 32.8 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 36.4% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 215 | 106 |
| Context | 256K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 61.3% | 80.5% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 36.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 10.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.