# Command A vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 47.8.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 44.7 |
| Rank | 212 | 72 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1488 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1483 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1473 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1489 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1477 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1478 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.