# Command A vs Qwen3.5-9B

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 39× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-5-9b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5-9B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Command A leads 35.9 to 14.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 24.5% for Qwen3.5-9B.
- Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Qwen3.5-9B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 215 | 236 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 61.3% | 71.2% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 24.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.46 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 39× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Qwen3.5-9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5-9B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3.5-9B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.