# Command A vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

> Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 53.3 to 37.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 28.8% for Command A and 73.7% for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B.
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is cheaper at $0.60 / $3.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 46.0 |
| Rank | 215 | 67 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 42.0 (#114)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1465 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1400 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.3 (#53)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 24.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 81.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 84.4% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 97.8% |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 34.5 (#70)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 73.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 87.5% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 37.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 58.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 13% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 65.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.65 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 46.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1454 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 31.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1462 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 86.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.7 (#44)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.7 (#59)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1500 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1426 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1384 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1441 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1424 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#74)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.3 (#79)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1438 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1401 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1478 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.60 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.0 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.