# Command A vs Qwen3-4B

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-4B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Command A leads 35.9 to 27.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 57.1% for Command A and 35.7% for Qwen3-4B.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 215 | 264 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | 35.7% |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 5.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3-4B?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3-4B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.