# Command A vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

> Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-235b-a22b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 235B-A22B in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 235B-A22B leads 44.3 to 27.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 12% for Command A and 59.6% for Qwen3 235B-A22B.
- Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 215 | 91 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 44.3 (#75)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | 59.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1445 |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 41% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | 52.1% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -11.34 |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.7 (#311)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 69.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1433 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 80.3% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 29.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 31% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 11% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.85 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.7 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 50.4 (#57)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1432 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 68.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 8.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.6 (#73)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1463 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 80.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 84.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.3 (#89)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1409 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1445 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1433 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1391 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1411 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1430 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.6 (#136)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1408 |
| IFEval | — | 83.5% |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#26)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1426 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 75% |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.6 (#108)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1419 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1384 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1432 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83% |
| WildBench | — | 86.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Command A does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.