# Command A vs Qwen3 14B

> Command A and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 14B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 14B leads 36.7 to 26.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 28.8% for Command A and 49.1% for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 212 | 222 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 49.1% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 64% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 18.2% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 5.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen3 14B?

Command A and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Command A does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3 14B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.