# Command A vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Command A leads 35.7 to 18.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 28.8% for Command A and 36% for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- Both cost about the same: $2.50 input and $10 output per million tokens.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 212 | 298 |
| Context | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $2.80 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $8.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.4 (#136)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| OSWorld | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.0 (#228)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 32.9 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $2.80 per million input tokens and $8.40 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Command A does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.