# Command A vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

> Command A has enough public results to be ranked (#215); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen2-5-coder
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | — |
| Rank | 215 | — |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Command A has enough public results to be ranked (#215); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.