# Command A vs Qwen Plus

> Command A and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 36.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command A leads 33.5 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 28.8% for Command A and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 212 | 204 |
| Context | 256K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1328 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 24% |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Qwen Plus?

Command A and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 36.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen Plus share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.