# Command A vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-phi-3-small-8k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Command A leads 69.1 to 51.9.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 29.3 |
| Rank | 215 | 314 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

| Benchmark | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1101 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

| Benchmark | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1100 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

| Benchmark | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1151 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

| Benchmark | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1067 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

| Benchmark | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1135 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1111 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

| Benchmark | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

| Benchmark | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1088 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

| Benchmark | Command A | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1068 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (27.2 vs 27.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.