# Command A vs Palm 2

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Palm 2 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 20.9.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 215 | 298 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

| Benchmark | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 994 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

| Benchmark | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1005 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1049 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

| Benchmark | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

| Benchmark | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1010 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

| Benchmark | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

| Benchmark | Command A | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 994 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Palm 2?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Palm 2 better for coding?

Palm 2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.0 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.