# Command A vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 37.1 to 18.3.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 215 | 304 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

| Benchmark | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

| Benchmark | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Command A | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.6 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.