# Command A vs Mistral Small 3.2

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 33× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-mistral-small-3-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 37.1 to 26.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 28.8% for Command A and 40.4% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 31.2 |
| Rank | 215 | 280 |
| Context | 256K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.0938 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)

| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)

| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1255 |
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 33× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 256K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.