# Command A vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 42.7 to 26.8.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 212 | 91 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1467 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: —

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1445 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1449 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1469 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.