# Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 44.3 to 26.8.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 44.4 |
| Rank | 212 | 74 |
| Context | 256K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1516 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1481 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1477 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1516 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1424 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1465 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1460 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.