# Command A vs Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b

> Command A and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-llama-3-1-tulu-3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.5 to 35.6.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 35.1 |
| Rank | 212 | 220 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 33.9 (#235)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1184 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 21.8 (#188)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1174 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 31.3 (#196)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1195 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.6 (#241)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1169 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1175 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 61.6 (#241)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1174 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.8 (#234)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1181 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 39.9 (#240)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1193 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1154 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b?

Command A and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Command A or Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.9 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has 11.