# Command A vs Llama 2-7B

> Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-llama-2-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 2-7B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.5 to 23.9.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 212 | 315 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1002 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Llama 2-7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1009 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 98.54 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1036 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Llama 2-7B: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 969 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1006 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 999 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)

| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1029 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Llama 2-7B?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Llama 2-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.7 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Llama 2-7B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.