# Command A vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 38.2 to 17.7.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 212 | 90 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.01 |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.