# Command A vs Kimi K2.6

> Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-kimi-k2-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Kimi K2.6 leads 50.5 to 26.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.3% for Command A and 90.9% for Kimi K2.6.
- Kimi K2.6 is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Kimi K2.6 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 212 | 52 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 55.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,093 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1470 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 90.9% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 37.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 151.03 |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 25.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 96.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 10.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1491 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.9% |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1282 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1521 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1449 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1442 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1428 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1451 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1468 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1434 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1725 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1453 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1202 |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.6 does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Kimi K2.6 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.