# Command A vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-kimi-k2-5-instant
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 42.3 to 26.8.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 212 | 92 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1483 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1443 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1443 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1438 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1448 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1430 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1435 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)

| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1379 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.