# Command A vs Hy3

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-hy3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.6 to 26.8.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 212 | 79 |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.13 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.53 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Hy3: 46.6 (#60)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1465 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Hy3: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Hy3: 25.0 (#134)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1449 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Hy3: 37.4 (#98)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1475 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Hy3: 40.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1461 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Hy3: 53.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1427 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1496 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1461 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1390 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1435 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Hy3: 75.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Hy3: 44.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1443 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Hy3: 62.5 (#75)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1442 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1399 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Hy3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 17.