# Command A vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

> Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-hunyuan-vision-1-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 41.8 to 27.2.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 215 | 98 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1418 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1416 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1397 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1404 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1422 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.