# Command A vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

> Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-hunyuan-turbos
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 39.3 to 26.8.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 40.6 |
| Rank | 212 | 138 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1361 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1374 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1359 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1338 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1416 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1390 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1338 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1344 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1365 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1358 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1387 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.