# Command A vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 40.9 to 27.2.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 215 | 114 |
| Context | 256K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1390 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1414 |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1395 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1384 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command A or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.