# Command A vs Grok Build 0.1

> Command A and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 36.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-grok-build-0-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 43.1 to 27.2.
- Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 36.4 |
| Rank | 215 | 216 |
| Context | 256K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $1 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Grok Build 0.1?

Command A and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 36.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 256K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.