# Command A vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 26.8.
- Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 46.6 |
| Rank | 212 | 56 |
| Context | 256K | 500K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command A: 26.8 (#317)
- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1423 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.7 (#36)
- Grok 4.7: —

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 17.7 (#276)
- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1409 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |

## Math

- Command A: 33.5 (#172)
- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1393 |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 36.5 (#157)
- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1413 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command A: —
- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.5 (#166)
- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.3 (#172)
- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#147)
- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.8 (#204)
- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

| Benchmark | Command A | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1389 |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and Grok 4.7 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.