# Command A vs GLM-5.1

> GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-a-vs-glm-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and GLM-5.1 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-5.1 leads 48.7 to 27.2.
- GLM-5.1 is cheaper at $1.40 / $4.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 200K.

## Snapshot

| | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 47.8 |
| Rank | 215 | 59 |
| Context | 256K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $4.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command A: 27.2 (#322)
- GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1485 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 74.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
| SciCode | — | 43.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 57.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 887.1 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command A: 35.9 (#40)
- GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 40.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.1% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,634 |

## Reasoning

- Command A: 18.3 (#283)
- GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60)

| Benchmark | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1472 |
| SimpleBench | — | 55.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 77.7% |
| CritPt | — | 4.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 69.8% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.84 |

## Math

- Command A: 36.2 (#171)
- GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1473 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 36.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 67.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 22.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 33.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 12.5% |

## Knowledge

- Command A: 37.1 (#159)
- GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1476 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 89.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command A: 45.3 (#170)
- GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1447 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1515 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1474 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1465 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1434 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1418 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1454 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1469 |

## Instruction Following

- Command A: 69.1 (#177)
- GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1451 |

## Long Context

- Command A: 40.6 (#151)
- GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1466 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command A: 47.6 (#208)
- GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31)

| Benchmark | Command A | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1461 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1453 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1592 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1472 |

## FAQ

### Is Command A better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command A or GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

### Is Command A or GLM-5.1 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Command A does, with 256K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Command A and GLM-5.1 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.